Democracy Lesson
Lesson Shown by Lebanon War
Pyongyang, August 30, 2006 (KCNA) -- The United States sustained shameful defeat in the Lebanon war. Cutting straight to the bullshit... What the U.S. and Israel pursued in the war was to wipe out the Hezbollah force at a blow according to its strategy of "anti-terrorism" and to expand the American-style "democratization" in the Middle East region. However, any positive situation for the American-style "democratization" has not been created in the region but its prospect become gloomy. I still ain't counting democracy out yet... The shitty Middle East countries came to realize clearly the aggressive nature of the "anti-terrorist war" of the United States and the bellicosity and brutality of the Bush administration through the war and held higher the anti-U.S. banner. Terrorists held that banner high enough, in my opinion. It eloquently proves the political fiasco of the United States in the war. "Eloquently"? The Syrian President stated that the "conception for new Middle East" conceived by the United States and Israel is a delusion and on the verge of bankruptcy owing to their defeat in the war. So I guess Israel WAS involved... The United States and Israel also suffered ignominious military defeat. In accordance with the scenario worked out by the U.S., Israel mobilized tens of thousands of armed forces and latest war equipment for 30-odd days to launch vigorous attacks on Hezbollah in the air and on the ground and sea. The Hezbollah guerrillas, which had neither tanks nor aircraft, were very poor but gained the supremacy over the Israeli army with their stubborn resistance and tactical advantage, if by "supremacy" you mean suffering thousands of lives and massive infrastucture damage, while inflicting no more damage than the average Palestinian suicide bomber in retaliation. The war showed Israel could not subdue the Hezbollah force and the escalation of the "anti-terrorist war" through the Lebanon war resulted in further tightening the windpipe of the U.S. The international community compelled the United States to comply with the demand for giving up the war and to make public that the issue of disarming the Hezbollah force is left to Lebanon. Seems like an uncompelling option. The U.S. thus retreated from the stand on wiping out Hezbollah it had taken at the initial phase of the war. ??? Now the Bush administration does not dare dispatch its troops to the ever growing UN peace-keeping force to be deployed in southern Lebanon according to the resolution of the UN Security Council. Is this not the most bizarre lunacy ever wrote? The international community ridicules the Bush administration crazy with "liberal democracy". Guess not... Mass media observes that encouraged by the Lebanon war, Iran, Syria and other countries will tighten their partnership and further strengthen their stance against the U.S. in the Middle East. The American-style "democratization" the purpose of which is to trample down the sovereignty of other nations and impose disgrace and submission on them is nothing but a day-dream. I just fell asleep during this "lesson" also... This is the lesson given to the U.S. by the Lebanon war. The United States should give up its foolish attempt to change sovereign states and nations at will. That seems about as likely as North Korea giving up it's nuclear weapon ambitions...
Pyongyang, August 30, 2006 (KCNA) -- The United States sustained shameful defeat in the Lebanon war. Cutting straight to the bullshit... What the U.S. and Israel pursued in the war was to wipe out the Hezbollah force at a blow according to its strategy of "anti-terrorism" and to expand the American-style "democratization" in the Middle East region. However, any positive situation for the American-style "democratization" has not been created in the region but its prospect become gloomy. I still ain't counting democracy out yet... The shitty Middle East countries came to realize clearly the aggressive nature of the "anti-terrorist war" of the United States and the bellicosity and brutality of the Bush administration through the war and held higher the anti-U.S. banner. Terrorists held that banner high enough, in my opinion. It eloquently proves the political fiasco of the United States in the war. "Eloquently"? The Syrian President stated that the "conception for new Middle East" conceived by the United States and Israel is a delusion and on the verge of bankruptcy owing to their defeat in the war. So I guess Israel WAS involved... The United States and Israel also suffered ignominious military defeat. In accordance with the scenario worked out by the U.S., Israel mobilized tens of thousands of armed forces and latest war equipment for 30-odd days to launch vigorous attacks on Hezbollah in the air and on the ground and sea. The Hezbollah guerrillas, which had neither tanks nor aircraft, were very poor but gained the supremacy over the Israeli army with their stubborn resistance and tactical advantage, if by "supremacy" you mean suffering thousands of lives and massive infrastucture damage, while inflicting no more damage than the average Palestinian suicide bomber in retaliation. The war showed Israel could not subdue the Hezbollah force and the escalation of the "anti-terrorist war" through the Lebanon war resulted in further tightening the windpipe of the U.S. The international community compelled the United States to comply with the demand for giving up the war and to make public that the issue of disarming the Hezbollah force is left to Lebanon. Seems like an uncompelling option. The U.S. thus retreated from the stand on wiping out Hezbollah it had taken at the initial phase of the war. ??? Now the Bush administration does not dare dispatch its troops to the ever growing UN peace-keeping force to be deployed in southern Lebanon according to the resolution of the UN Security Council. Is this not the most bizarre lunacy ever wrote? The international community ridicules the Bush administration crazy with "liberal democracy". Guess not... Mass media observes that encouraged by the Lebanon war, Iran, Syria and other countries will tighten their partnership and further strengthen their stance against the U.S. in the Middle East. The American-style "democratization" the purpose of which is to trample down the sovereignty of other nations and impose disgrace and submission on them is nothing but a day-dream. I just fell asleep during this "lesson" also... This is the lesson given to the U.S. by the Lebanon war. The United States should give up its foolish attempt to change sovereign states and nations at will. That seems about as likely as North Korea giving up it's nuclear weapon ambitions...
posted by KnightofGoodMrIronMan at 8:34 PM
12 Comments:
"The United States should give up its foolish attempt to change sovereign states and nations at will. That seems about as likely as North Korea giving up it's nuclear weapon ambitions..."
Except North Korea has more legitimacy to have nuclear weapons than America does to change sovereign states.
"North Korea has more legitimacy to have nuclear weapons than America does to change sovereign states."
I guess one would also have to assume North Korea has "legitimacy" when it brutally denies it's population from owning anything...
I'm sure CRYmru also thinks Saddam Hussein(as with kim Jong Il) was well within his "legitimacy" in torturing, raping, murdering, gassing his own citizens, as well...
In CRYmru's "world", the U.S.A should cease all foreign influence and allow China, Russia and the Middle East to do all that for us...
North Korea can develop nuclear weapons, and America has a legitimate Right to change the "Democratic" "People's" "Republic" of Korea for doing so...
p.s Please cry about how I never answer, CRYmru.
bellicosity.......now there's a great word so seldom used anymore.
"I guess one would also have to assume North Korea has "legitimacy" when it brutally denies it's population from owning anything..."
I'm sorry, but by international law it is a sovereign state. Just because you don't think it deserves to be a state doesn't mean that it isn't.
"I'm sure CRYmru also thinks Saddam Hussein(as with kim Jong Il) was well within his "legitimacy" in torturing, raping, murdering, gassing his own citizens, as well..."
Lol. Oh, you do have a simple mind.
So because I think that North Korea, as all sovereign states, should be allowed to have weapons as self defence, then I believe that Saddam should be allowed to kill people?
Don't be so stupid.
"In CRYmru's "world", the U.S.A should cease all foreign influence and allow China, Russia and the Middle East to do all that for us..."
No, I don't think America should go around bombing the shit out of people and flexing its military muscle when it pleases. Does any other country in the world do that? Doesn't it seem slightly out of place?
"North Korea can develop nuclear weapons, and America has a legitimate Right to change the "Democratic" "People's" "Republic" of Korea for doing so..."
Go on then, tell me why?
Why should one sovereign state have the right to overthrow another one when it is breaking international law? But of course, America is above internation law, isn't it.
"p.s Please cry about how I never answer, CRYmru. "
1) Well done on that amazing pun. Again, you never cease to amaze me. Can you do any more? Or can you only do one?
2) Frankly, this makes you look a bit stupid because every other argument we have ends in you being silent. How about answering every argument we've had since I've started visiting this site for my own amusement.
Doesn't that just suggest thatyou cannot back up your points?
"bellicosity.......now there's a great word so seldom used anymore."
Uhhh, the K.C.N.A usually uses "bellicose" in every other "report" to describe U.S action.
p.s The K.C.N.A has a very weak grasp on the English language...
"I'm sorry, but by international law it is a sovereign state."
Yea, so let's all just continue to allow North Koreans to starve to death on the streets...
"Why should one sovereign state have the right to overthrow another one when it is breaking international law?"
Because some sovereign states like North Korea are nothing more than a brutal dictatorships, that deserve to be overthrown at all cost. The taliBAN, Baathists and the Mullahs are also examples of this phenomenom.
"Frankly, this makes you look a bit stupid because every other argument we have ends in you being silent."
Go cry yourself back to sleep CRYmru, for in "CRYmruDreamland"... There ARE no savage maniacs running entire countries outside of Britain's borders...
"Yea, so let's all just continue to allow North Koreans to starve to death on the streets..."
Or how about other third world countries such as Congo, or East Timor?
"Because some sovereign states like North Korea are nothing more than a brutal dictatorships, that deserve to be overthrown at all cost. The taliBAN, Baathists and the Mullahs are also examples of this phenomenom."
And is it to you, the right wingers, and the American hegemony to decide who should get overthrown and who shouldn't? What about Arabia? Or how about the -stans? Why isn't there any type of coherence in America's foreign policy?
"Go cry yourself back to sleep CRYmru, for in "CRYmruDreamland"... There ARE no savage maniacs running entire countries outside of Britain's borders... "
Wow. That doesn't answer the fact that you don't answer and therefore look stupid, does it? In fact, it's completely changing the subject!
And anyways, can you not think of any more great puns on my name? I'm challenging you! You resort to name calling instead of answering the dozens of other posts I have put up. Quite pathetic, isn't it?
"how about other third world countries such as Congo, or East Timor?"
Almost as bad as North Korea...
"And is it to you, the right wingers,"
Yea...
"and the American hegemony"
I'm Canadian...
"to decide who should get overthrown and who shouldn't?"
Those are easy decisions. North Korea is at the top of the list...
"What about Arabia?"
You bet.
"Or how about the -stans?"
Yes, of course Mr. Obvious...
"Why isn't there any type of coherence in America's foreign policy?"
Because you need to be literate to understand it...
"I'm challenging you!"
To what? A useless comment competition??? You win.
"You resort to name calling instead of answering the dozens of other posts I have put up."
*sob*
Thanks for visiting anyway CRYmru...
"Almost as bad as North Korea..."
Well, shouldn't we overthrow them because their people are starving too then?
""and the American hegemony"
I'm Canadian..."
No Shit. Why should it be up to the right wingers (you) and the American hegemony (them trying to take over the world) to decide who rules their respective countries?
I thought you didn't like the U.N. as it is an undemocratic organisation. But then, how come America can rule the world by choosing who rules in this world?
""What about Arabia?"
You bet.
"Or how about the -stans?"
Yes, of course Mr. Obvious..."
Well why do America and the right wingers, and of course your hero George Bush, completely ignore the human rights abuses that go on there then? It isn't anything to do with oil, is it?
"Because you need to be literate to understand it..."
Yes, because obviously I can't read. What a fuckign stupid comment. How about answering the question instead of deflecting with a stupid comment?~
"To what? A useless comment competition??? You win."
No, really, you win. You're the one who do is! As long as you say it's useless!
"*sob*
Thanks for visiting anyway CRYmru... "
Lol. You truly are pathetic, aren't you! Well done on answering the question there, and well done on pointing out that your name calling is "useless", and well done on deflecting every single question.
You are the worst arguer I've ever come across! No wonder the right wing is absolutely doomed, with completely childish weirdos with you following blindly!
How pathetic.
"Well why do America and the right wingers, and of course your hero George Bush, completely ignore the human rights abuses that go on there then?"
While the Saudi citizens have much in common with Iraq and Iran, the one similarity they DO NOT share is that the Saudi "government" is not intent on destroying Israel and America...
Besides, just like every fucking other braindead leftist: YOU CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH FUCKING WAYS!
How can leftists deCRY the entire American effort to defeat terrorists, Iraq especially, but then cry about human rights abuses in countries that America is NOT at war with???
If you think it's so fucking bad in Saudi Arabia(it's not as bad as North Korea), as with America's support of it's "government"... WHAT THE FUCK IS YOUR SOLUTION CRYmru???
Let me guess, get out of Iraq, and end American Mid-east policies so that Saudia Arabia, Iraq, Iran and Israll can be turned into a giant and evil Islamic Empire...
"It isn't anything to do with oil, is it?"
When you're a crying commie loser, it's ALWAYS all about the oil...
"well done on deflecting every single question. You are the worst arguer I've ever come across!"
Why don't you cry about it...
"No wonder the right wing is absolutely doomed,"
Ahahahahahah!!!
And which country would that be in again??? Certainly NOT Canada...
:)
"While the Saudi citizens have much in common with Iraq and Iran, the one similarity they DO NOT share is that the Saudi "government" is not intent on destroying Israel and America..."
Since when has that been the precedent for invading countries? The right told us it was human rights that was the reason for Saddam being overthrown, not Israel! Was that ever a reason?
"Besides, just like every fucking other braindead leftist: YOU CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH FUCKING WAYS!"
I know! I'm just wondering why American foreign policy (and the right usually defends everything they do tooth and nail) is so hyppocritical. I'm not saying I want it both ways.
"How can leftists deCRY the entire American effort to defeat terrorists, Iraq especially, but then cry about human rights abuses in countries that America is NOT at war with???"
Because Iraq was never about terrorism. When did Iraq have anything to do with your constant fallback, 11/9? It was mainly Saudis! And the whole terrorist mess was started by the West's invasion of Iraq. Before, there were no "foreign fighters" going in. Now, it's every radical Islamo-fascists dream to be a martyr there.
"If you think it's so fucking bad in Saudi Arabia(it's not as bad as North Korea), as with America's support of it's "government"... WHAT THE FUCK IS YOUR SOLUTION CRYmru???"
My solution, as I have repeated and repeated, is some type of coherence in American foreign policy. Nothing more, nothing less. When America's hyppocritical foreign policy is relinquished, then maybe we can think of a good solution to problems in the world.
"Let me guess, get out of Iraq, and end American Mid-east policies so that Saudia Arabia, Iraq, Iran and Israll can be turned into a giant and evil Islamic Empire..."
Er... no. Pulling out of Iraq would be a good start, but do you really think that the whole place would then turn into some type of Caliphate?!
"When you're a crying commie loser, it's ALWAYS all about the oil..."
Lol. Great argument.
But I'm afraid it is about oil! So calling me a "crying commie" (why is that, btw?) doesn't exactly hide that fact. In fact, it completely avoids the issue, which you have been very good at.
"Why don't you cry about it..."
No, it's called a debate. Not that you would know about it!
"And which country would that be in again??? Certainly NOT Canada..."
Wow. GO CANADA!
Yawn.
Is my "crying" getting too much for you?!
Post a Comment
<< Home