Friday, March 10, 2006

By accident...

Even someone consistently wrong can shit a Good link.
This is the rhetoric I want to see more of CRYmru!

6 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oh dear.

"Even someone consistently wrong can shit a Good link."

How am I consistently wrong?

You can't answer a single one of the points I put up!

There are so many loose ends!

"This is the rhetoric I want to see more of CRYmru!"

LOL!

Do you know where any of these countries are either? Where's France, then? Where's Iran?

Shall we bomb Italy?

You really do make me laugh.

You can't debate (then accuse ME of being stupid), you make ridiculous comments and cannot back them up(how al Jazeera are terrorists, blood for oil is more humane than oil for food),and resort to calling names and completely avoidint the point!

Believe me, I have debated with many right wingers. Some are decent, have decent arguments, and sometimes even have thought provoking arguments.

But I'm afraid that you are truly the most pathetic right winger I have talked to.

I wonder what your response will be? Accuse me of crying (because my name has a "c" and a "y" in it)? Call me names? Put a lot of capital letters and exclamation marks in a sentence?

Or will you put up a decent argument?

I somehow doubt that, as since October you haven't managed to do so.

Lol.

3:17 AM  
Blogger KnightofGoodMrIronMan said...

Blood for oil is more humane than oil for food.

Under Saddam Hussein, "oil for food" never existed. The reality was that all the program did was intensify and justify sanctions that never should have been there in the first place. Under the U.N's "guidance" Saddam retained national control of Iraqi Oil resourses, and continued to build his military, while his people all suffered from the effects of Oil sanctions. Let's not forget that many many U.N staffers got RICH$$$ with "Oil for food".

The program has few differences from the U.N's current "Aid for Il" program. When North Korea gets free food, only Kim Jong Il sees benefit.

"Blood for Oil" is what matters, as Iraqi people now have a stake in the development of Oil infrastructure. In the future, when stable and prosperous democracies develop in the region... The people will be the only benefactors of Oil wealth. Like with Alberta.

Now stop fucking crying about "no argument" CRYmru, ya little crybitch.

6:05 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"When North Korea gets free food, only Kim Jong Il sees benefit."

Lol. You think he eats it all?!

"Let's not forget that many many U.N staffers got RICH$$$ with "Oil for food"."

I'm not saying that it was a complete success. But claiming that blood for oil is more humane is an absurd comment. Is indiscriminate bombing ever humane?

""Blood for Oil" is what matters, as Iraqi people now have a stake in the development of Oil infrastructure. In the future, when stable and prosperous democracies develop in the region... The people will be the only benefactors of Oil wealth"

I must admit I don't know who owns these fields. The only thing I know is that these oil fields were the first things protected when the invasion happened. And so far, it looks a complete mess.

Anyways, do you really think that America invaded so the people could benefit from the oil?

"Now stop fucking crying about "no argument" CRYmru, ya little crybitch. "

2 things- I was correct- you will accuse me of crying, and you will call me names (don't you think this is just getting childish by now?)

And secondly, you have answered one question. How about the other ones above, or even the ones littered across this site?

I claim you have no arguments, because you haven't answered tens of posts that I have put up.

1:03 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oh, and regarding the video:

do you not realise that it's ironic, and highlighting the stupidity of those who are so gung-ho about war?

It's not meant to be a good link!

1:04 PM  
Blogger KnightofGoodMrIronMan said...

"Lol. You think he eats it all?!"
No. The North Korean army does...

"Is indiscriminate bombing ever humane?"
Indiscriminatly bombing the North Korean government would be...

1:42 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Indiscriminatly bombing the North Korean government would be... "

Yes, but that's not what I asked is it?!

3:28 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home