Favored outcome...
By Park Song 
Almost half of juniors surveyed, who will get their first voting rights in the 2007 presidential election, said in a recent poll that South Korea should side with North Korea if Washington attacks nuclear facilities in the North and?!?without Seoul's consent.
If "almost half" side with North Korea, who would the MAJORITY be siding with? What in the fuck kind of a loaded dice question is that? South Koreans must ENJOY having a third-world communist dictatorship next door...
South Korea plans to provide North Korea with 1.2 trillion won ($1 billion) in aid this year, including rice and fertilizers. The total sum of international welfare amounts to 0.16 percent of South Korea's gross national income.
*snicker* Perhaps Canada should become a communist State, and mooch 0.16% off of America's gross national income. We could be living the sweeet life!
Almost half of juniors surveyed, who will get their first voting rights in the 2007 presidential election, said in a recent poll that South Korea should side with North Korea if Washington attacks nuclear facilities in the North and?!?without Seoul's consent.
If "almost half" side with North Korea, who would the MAJORITY be siding with? What in the fuck kind of a loaded dice question is that? South Koreans must ENJOY having a third-world communist dictatorship next door...
South Korea plans to provide North Korea with 1.2 trillion won ($1 billion) in aid this year, including rice and fertilizers. The total sum of international welfare amounts to 0.16 percent of South Korea's gross national income.
*snicker* Perhaps Canada should become a communist State, and mooch 0.16% off of America's gross national income. We could be living the sweeet life!
posted by KnightofGoodMrIronMan at 9:04 PM
7 Comments:
"What in the fuck kind of a loaded dice question is that?"
What's the loaded part in the question?
"If "almost half" side with North Korea, who would the MAJORITY be siding with?"
I think the point is that many people would side with the DPRK. Of course, the majority would side with the US, but "almost half" is a very high figure.
"South Koreans must ENJOY having a third-world communist dictatorship next door..."
Until very recently, South Korea was a shitty third world authoritarian dictatorship. I'm sure that there is some (and I use the word SOME carefully here) sympathy towards DPRK.
What's the loaded part in the question?"
The outcome of the answers...
"I think the point is that many people would side with the DPRK."
Uhhh, I think South Korea would side with the U.S in the event of a war, considering it would not BE the fucking U.S attacking them. It would be the country "almost half" of South Korea, "presumably", would side with(sounds like Italy WWII)...
"Of course, the majority would side with the US, but "almost half" is a very high figure."
It's a biased poll ya stupid fuck. Most are, this one much more than most. Wake up and stop trusting polls as your moral compass.
"Until very recently, South Korea was a shitty third world authoritarian dictatorship."
No. South Korea was a third world country after WWII, and North Korea was an economic industrial powerhouse in comparison. Slowly over the years, using capitalism and freedom, and with America's help...
Republic of Korea 2006, a nation with prosperity rivaled by few.
By comparison, North Korea with it's communist and socialist ways... Ranks as one of the worst places anywhere in the world.
"I'm sure that there is some (and I use the word SOME carefully here) sympathy towards DPRK."
No. South Koreans would rather just ship a little rice and medicine and call it a fucking day. Is that what you call sympathy CRYmru? The South Korean government LOOKED AT THE BOTTOM LINE, as to what is would COST it's citizens if North Korea joined it's Republic... and decided it to be a "poor" alternative...
I'm ecstatic the United States of America does NOT have leadership that comes to left-wing policy conclusions such as this...
Long Live Geroge W. Bush
If South Korea had ANY sympathy towards the horrible plight of it's own countrymen, they would be FIGHTING the DPRK.
Clearly, I seem to be the only one willing to fight Kim Jong Il.
"What's the loaded part in the question?"
The outcome of the answers..."
Yet again, you seem to believe that anything that doesn't conform to your narrow minded beliefs is totally wrong! How can the outcomes of the ANSWERS possible be loaded?!
""I think the point is that many people would side with the DPRK."
Uhhh, I think South Korea would side with the U.S in the event of a war, considering it would not BE the fucking U.S attacking them."
I repeat, many people would side with the DPRK. That's what the poll shows.
"It would be the country "almost half" of South Korea, "presumably", would side with(sounds like Italy WWII)..."
What? This doesn't make any grammatical sense.
"No. South Korea was a third world country after WWII,"
Yes, a third world authoritarian dictatorship.
"and North Korea was an economic industrial powerhouse in comparison. Slowly over the years, using capitalism and freedom, and with America's help...
Republic of Korea 2006, a nation with prosperity rivaled by few.
By comparison, North Korea with it's communist and socialist ways... Ranks as one of the worst places anywhere in the world."
Er. Great. Did I say otherwise?
"No. South Koreans would rather just ship a little rice and medicine and call it a fucking day."
Is this ironic? With you, I never know. Especially when you claimed that blood for oil was more humane than oil for food.
"Is that what you call sympathy CRYmru? "
What is this pathetic namecalling? Is it that you can't actually finish a debate, or even stay on topic that you resort to calling names?!
" The South Korean government LOOKED AT THE BOTTOM LINE, as to what is would COST it's citizens if North Korea joined it's Republic... and decided it to be a "poor" alternative... "
So...? I said that there might be sympathy towards DPRK. I didn't start rambling on about joining the two together did I?!
What is with the constant shifting of the point?
"Long Live Geroge W. Bush"
Yes, long live Geroge [sic].
"Clearly, I seem to be the only one willing to fight Kim Jong Il. "
LOL! Fighting?! I did actually laugh out loud then, too.
You brave, brave solider!
I love the way that one of my points has been disected into about 5 irrelevant points... again....
"your narrow minded beliefs is totally wrong! How can the outcomes of the ANSWERS possible be loaded?!"
If I asked the youth of South Korea if they would support America if they were decapitating North Korean children... How many are going to support America???
"Especially when you claimed that blood for oil was more humane than oil for food."
Blood for oil and food and freedom is more human than blood for "aid". See above post, filed under "aid".
"I didn't start rambling on about joining the two together did I?!"
I did. My vision of it's reunification, however, does not include Kim Jong Il ...
"If I asked the youth of South Korea if they would support America if they were decapitating North Korean children... How many are going to support America???"
Er... None. Because that is a highly loaded question with an unlikely scenario. The survey isn't.
"Blood for oil and food and freedom is more human than blood for "aid". See above post, filed under "aid""
Blood for oil and food and freedom? What is this scenario?
What is blood for aid? When has this happened?
"I did."
Exactly. I make a point, then you avoid the question and talk about how bad DPRK is. It's completely irrelevant. I wonder how many points you have actually answered!
that is a highly loaded question with an unlikely scenario."
I know. That's why I wrote the post...
"I make a point, then you avoid the question"
*snicker(of defiance)*
see above comment listed under "hypocrisy"...
"and talk about how bad DPRK is."
Have you ever actually READ a fucking post from this blog? Have you noticed a trend/theme brainwave?
"I know. That's why I wrote the post..."
No, you seem to misunderstand (although I can hardly say I'm surprised).
This:
""If I asked the youth of South Korea if they would support America if they were decapitating North Korean children... How many are going to support America???""
Is highly unlikely. The scenario in the survey is vaguely possible.
"*snicker(of defiance)*
see above comment listed under "hypocrisy"..."
What, because I "flip flop" (whatever that is!), you avoid the question? There are so many points you haven't answered- and frankly look ridiculous as a result!
You resort to semantics, interrupting sentences, swearing and capital letters, but don't put up a decent argument!
""and talk about how bad DPRK is."
Have you ever actually READ a fucking post from this blog? Have you noticed a trend/theme brainwave? "
No, I haven't.
The point is, if I make a point, resorting to "kim jong il is evil" is hardly much of an argument.
BRAINWAVE?!
Post a Comment
<< Home