NOW I'm mad...
Pyongyang, September 6 (KCNA) -- The Koreans regard the independent right of the country and their interests as their life and soul and it is their characteristic feature to protect them to the last How DOES a "PEACEFUL" nuclear energy program "PROTECT" anyone or anything?. So nobody should expect the DPRK to waive its right to peaceful nuclear activity Rodong Sinmun Tuesday says this in a commentary. The news "analyst" goes on: why is it always reported "it goes on" INSIDE every "report"?
At the first-phase of the 4th ahhh just 4 eh six-party talks, the U.S. was adamant in insisting that the DPRK totally give up all its nuclear activities including the use of nuclear energy for a peaceful purpose, to say nothing of its nuclear weapons program. That was unilateral and high-handed demand on which the latter can neither make any compromise nor accept. A complete removal of the U.S. nuclear threat to the DPRK and whatever "threat" they pose to the rest of the world, apparently its drop of hostile policy aimed at stifling the latter would automatically lead to lifting its measures taken to bolster the nuclear deterrence for self-defense to say NOTHING of the DPRK's domestic political "policy". The DPRK's nuclear activity for a peaceful purpose is one of key economic sectors which should be further developed as economy makes progress and the material and cultural demand of the people increases. The nuclear activity for a peaceful purpose is an exercise of a legitimate right enshrined in international law the same "enshrined" fucking LAW you assholes broke in 2002. Russia, China, Japan, the U.S. and south Korea, parties to the six-party talks except for the DPRK, massively produce and use AND NEED nuclear energies. This being a hard reality, the U.S. is faulting the DPRK's nuclear activity for a peaceful purpose though it is an exercise of its sovereign right and permitted by international law and leaves no stone unturned to stop it if under that "stone" of a peaceful energy program lies a nuclear weapon. The DPRK is neither a war criminal state no, just a nice brainwashing dictatorship... nor a defeated state North Korea is a DEFEATED STATE, in every single definition of the term and has not done anything harmful to others just yourself. For what reason should it abandon its right to peaceful nuclear activity? The country is run by an evil dictator, that can't be trusted with a nuclear program. The DPRK had built the nuclear power facilities for decades tightening its belts. It is unimaginable for the DPRK to dismantle its independent nuclear power industry built with so much effort, yielding to outsiders' pressure, without getting any proposal for compensating for the loss of nuclear energy. The DPRK will as ever make ceaseless peaceful nuclear activity for the economic construction and the improvement of the standard of people's living if only nuclear energy had the power to improve North Korea's political system. Consistent is the DPRK's stand to seek a negotiated solution to the nuclear issue and denuclearize the Korean Peninsula. If the U.S. tries to have its unreasonable demand met by coercion from the stand of strength in defiance of the principle of impartiality, the situation will only get further complicated, much less any successful progress at the six-party talks. The U.S. should acknowledge the DPRK's legitimate right to nuclear activity for a peaceful purpose and take an option to find a fair settlement of the nuclear issue. If America was not Righteous, they would just let Kim solidify the leadership of North Korea, with the ceaseless rule of a monarchist TYRANNT.
At the first-phase of the 4th ahhh just 4 eh six-party talks, the U.S. was adamant in insisting that the DPRK totally give up all its nuclear activities including the use of nuclear energy for a peaceful purpose, to say nothing of its nuclear weapons program. That was unilateral and high-handed demand on which the latter can neither make any compromise nor accept. A complete removal of the U.S. nuclear threat to the DPRK and whatever "threat" they pose to the rest of the world, apparently its drop of hostile policy aimed at stifling the latter would automatically lead to lifting its measures taken to bolster the nuclear deterrence for self-defense to say NOTHING of the DPRK's domestic political "policy". The DPRK's nuclear activity for a peaceful purpose is one of key economic sectors which should be further developed as economy makes progress and the material and cultural demand of the people increases. The nuclear activity for a peaceful purpose is an exercise of a legitimate right enshrined in international law the same "enshrined" fucking LAW you assholes broke in 2002. Russia, China, Japan, the U.S. and south Korea, parties to the six-party talks except for the DPRK, massively produce and use AND NEED nuclear energies. This being a hard reality, the U.S. is faulting the DPRK's nuclear activity for a peaceful purpose though it is an exercise of its sovereign right and permitted by international law and leaves no stone unturned to stop it if under that "stone" of a peaceful energy program lies a nuclear weapon. The DPRK is neither a war criminal state no, just a nice brainwashing dictatorship... nor a defeated state North Korea is a DEFEATED STATE, in every single definition of the term and has not done anything harmful to others just yourself. For what reason should it abandon its right to peaceful nuclear activity? The country is run by an evil dictator, that can't be trusted with a nuclear program. The DPRK had built the nuclear power facilities for decades tightening its belts. It is unimaginable for the DPRK to dismantle its independent nuclear power industry built with so much effort, yielding to outsiders' pressure, without getting any proposal for compensating for the loss of nuclear energy. The DPRK will as ever make ceaseless peaceful nuclear activity for the economic construction and the improvement of the standard of people's living if only nuclear energy had the power to improve North Korea's political system. Consistent is the DPRK's stand to seek a negotiated solution to the nuclear issue and denuclearize the Korean Peninsula. If the U.S. tries to have its unreasonable demand met by coercion from the stand of strength in defiance of the principle of impartiality, the situation will only get further complicated, much less any successful progress at the six-party talks. The U.S. should acknowledge the DPRK's legitimate right to nuclear activity for a peaceful purpose and take an option to find a fair settlement of the nuclear issue. If America was not Righteous, they would just let Kim solidify the leadership of North Korea, with the ceaseless rule of a monarchist TYRANNT.
posted by KnightofGoodMrIronMan at 7:32 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home