Why a hard line is needed...
World Tribune
Iranian Supreme National Security Council Secretary Ali Larijani. IRINN TV aired this speech on Sept. 20.
Larijani: " [America] has said: 'Because we suspect someone's intentions, we should take preemptive measures against him.' The interesting thing is that the Americans have and invented nuclear weapons. They used them in ending the war against Japan, and yet they still think it's necessary to read the intentions of a country that has "peaceful" nuclear technology. And nuclear weapons, by their account.
"This aggressiveness is unacceptable in today's world. You have pressured North Korea for two years and consequently, it withdrew from the NPT and IAEA. What did you do after these two years? You accepted North Korea's nuclear program. In other words, you agreed that North Korea would have nuclear technology and uranium enrichment, but that it would not be diverted to the production of weapons. You could have achieved this from the start. No, they could have ENDED it from the start with a strike on Yongbyon. You simply applied not too much pressure on it. Western countries should learn a lesson from the experience of the North Korean nuclear dossier, like north Korea did with A.Q Khan. Applying such pressure is like going against an entire nation. Go after the "leader" then...
"I recommend once again that you pay attention to the conduct of North Korea. After two years of dealings with North Korea, what have you got? You have accepted North Korea's nuclear technology in the field of uranium enrichment. So accept ours now. We have no problem. We don't want anything else. Sounds like a bunch a ganga extorting muthafuckaas ta ME...
Here's a twin paradox for everyone...
Iran, a country with vast oil AND uranium deposits(thus uranium enrichment)... But little need for a nuclear reactor, that MUST have one.
North Korea, a country with few energy and uranium deposits... Thus a NEED for a nuclear reactor, that MUST have uranium enrichment.
Is there not a middle ground?
Here is my idea. An Iranian uranium enrichment program to sell uranium exclusively to the Yongbyon 50 MW station.
And war if either one makes weapons with the technology...
Iranian Supreme National Security Council Secretary Ali Larijani. IRINN TV aired this speech on Sept. 20.
Larijani: " [America] has said: 'Because we suspect someone's intentions, we should take preemptive measures against him.' The interesting thing is that the Americans have and invented nuclear weapons. They used them in ending the war against Japan, and yet they still think it's necessary to read the intentions of a country that has "peaceful" nuclear technology. And nuclear weapons, by their account.
"This aggressiveness is unacceptable in today's world. You have pressured North Korea for two years and consequently, it withdrew from the NPT and IAEA. What did you do after these two years? You accepted North Korea's nuclear program. In other words, you agreed that North Korea would have nuclear technology and uranium enrichment, but that it would not be diverted to the production of weapons. You could have achieved this from the start. No, they could have ENDED it from the start with a strike on Yongbyon. You simply applied not too much pressure on it. Western countries should learn a lesson from the experience of the North Korean nuclear dossier, like north Korea did with A.Q Khan. Applying such pressure is like going against an entire nation. Go after the "leader" then...
"I recommend once again that you pay attention to the conduct of North Korea. After two years of dealings with North Korea, what have you got? You have accepted North Korea's nuclear technology in the field of uranium enrichment. So accept ours now. We have no problem. We don't want anything else. Sounds like a bunch a ganga extorting muthafuckaas ta ME...
Here's a twin paradox for everyone...
Iran, a country with vast oil AND uranium deposits(thus uranium enrichment)... But little need for a nuclear reactor, that MUST have one.
North Korea, a country with few energy and uranium deposits... Thus a NEED for a nuclear reactor, that MUST have uranium enrichment.
Is there not a middle ground?
Here is my idea. An Iranian uranium enrichment program to sell uranium exclusively to the Yongbyon 50 MW station.
And war if either one makes weapons with the technology...
posted by KnightofGoodMrIronMan at 7:20 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home