Ask Congress.
U.S. Urged to End Its Military Presence in Iraq
Pyongyang, November 20, 2005 (KCNA) -- If the U.S. imperialists continue to pursue their policy of military occupation and rule over Iraq, defying the demand of the Iraqi people like Zarqawi and the mind-set of the "world public", they will meet only bitter shame and miserable death. It's never happened before... Rodong Sinmun Sunday warns this in a signed article as regards the daily increasing death toll of the U.S. forces in Iraq. If there is one thing North Korea knows well, it's "rising death tolls"... Recalling that the death toll of the U.S. forces in Iraq reached 2,020 and the number of those wounded 14,500 as of Oct. 31 and their casualties have further increased recently, So has THE ENEMY'S! the article says: For this reason, the Bush administration is working hard to justify and perpetuate the U.S. military occupation and rule over Iraq, trumpeting that the U.S. is fighting in Iraq for a "free world" and urging the "brave U.S. soldiers" to fight for the sake of the "honor" of the U.S. But such behavior of the Bush administration has only driven the U.S. soldiers in Iraq into a bottomless dilemma, of which country is next. It is beyond doubt that any U.S. measure to tighten its military occupation and rule over Iraq would only touch off stronger resistance of Iraqis against it. "It" being tyranny and terror. Only disgrace and death await the aggressors. History has no precedent in which aggressors escaped their defeat. The U.S. is keen to establish the American-style domination and order in the world and act an emperor, going against the trend of the times, I'll say!.
This is, however, as foolish an act as digging its own grave. Like Zarqawi did with the bombs...
14 Comments:
I think that guy works on ensign rig 21. At sandy-4
"?"
Wrong. Now fuck off ya greasy RigPig...
i think that guy works at the burger baron
"?"
That's a real knee fucking slapper. I would bet anyone this is the funniest thing you have said all year.
I'm taking a wild guess... You are a pathetic communist wannabe.
I have an open question for Cubans... How much worse will Cuba be run while Castro's Parkinson's disease gets,um, worse?
If you want to talk nonsense shit at this pile of Ash, while saying nothing about North Korea...
I hope you are prepared to enjoy the sensation of being CENSORED. OR FUCKING DELETED! Just like all those Good people in North Korea, China, and Cuba.
Oh my god are you serious censored on this page please no.
Your Right. Censorship is wrong, and is for communists.
Ya fuckin' Jackoff.
"I have an open question for Cubans... How much worse will Cuba be run while Castro's Parkinson's disease gets,um, worse?"
its not certain at all he has parkinsons. in fact, it is total hearsay.
and regarding censorship- it seems that its for capitalists too. have you heard the censorship of the document that mentions that bush wanted to bomb the al jazeera hq? its just come out now in the uk.
"its not certain at all he has parkinsons. in fact, it is total hearsay." The one thing certain is Cuba's weak leadership.
"and regarding censorship- it seems that its for capitalists too." No. America invented free speech, the same day they invented America. Duhhhhh.
"have you heard the censorship of the document that mentions that bush wanted to bomb the al jazeera hq?" Hmmmm. If it was censored, how are we able to talk about it? Brainwave. They should have bombed al-jazerra. That would not be an act of censorship, but a helpful act of war.
"its just come out now in the uk."
Thanks, I heard about it a week ago. You really didn't make much of a point with that "argument"...
""its not certain at all he has parkinsons. in fact, it is total hearsay." The one thing certain is Cuba's weak leadership."
wow. well done. bet it took you a while to come up with that response.
"If it was censored, how are we able to talk about it?"
it was leaked. the mirror (the paper that was the first to report) is now under investigation for breaching the official secrets act. no one else was allowed to report, and no one is allowed to elaborate now on this story. some free speech!
"Thanks, I heard about it a week ago. You really didn't make much of a point with that "argument"... "
I was pointing out censorship. what about your "argument"?
"That would not be an act of censorship, but a helpful act of war."
jesus christ. what next, bomb the bbc? what about fox? oh no, fox actually supports you.
""its not certain at all he has parkinsons. in fact, it is total hearsay." The one thing certain is Cuba's weak leadership."
wow. well done. bet it took you a while to come up with that response.
"If it was censored, how are we able to talk about it?"
it was leaked. the mirror (the paper that was the first to report) is now under investigation for breaching the official secrets act. no one else was allowed to report, and no one is allowed to elaborate now on this story. some free speech!
"Thanks, I heard about it a week ago. You really didn't make much of a point with that "argument"... "
I was pointing out censorship. what about your "argument"?
"That would not be an act of censorship, but a helpful act of war."
jesus christ. what next, bomb the bbc? what about fox? oh no, fox actually supports you.
Well, I am sure our enimies would love to bomb FOX. Aljazera will get caught helping Bin Laden's gang, sooner or later.
i love the way the right just assumes that al jazeera is linked with al qaeda. just because al qaedas videos get shown on it, doesnt mean they are in leagues with eachother.
"?"
Just like the Canadian government is not in bed with the CBC...
Gimme a fucking break.
what? has that got ANYTHING to do with al qaeda and al jazeera....?
no.
Post a Comment
<< Home